If (1) there is a dispute about the supply of goods for which payment is to be made under an L/C a specified number of days after the documents have been accepted by the issuing bank and released to the purchaser, and if (2) the purchaser of the goods has grounds for believing that following payment by the bank under the L/C to the supplier there will be no assets left in the jurisdiction out of which payment could be made to the purchaser if the court upholds the purchaser's claim against the supplier, (3) can the purchaser successfully petition the court to grant a freezing order <!--break-->which (A) prevents the bank from making payment on the due date specified in the L/C until the dispute is decided and (B) would allow the court subsequently to order, if the dispute is decided in the favor of the purchaser, that the amount to be remitted under the L/C by the bank should be reduced by the amount of any award to the purchaser?If this is not possible, how is the purchaser protected against the risk that the goods when received are found not to be as stated in the documents provided to the bank in accordance with the L/C? What is the purchaser's protection against fraudulent documents?  Does the UCP deal with this?